§ The result
HireVue takes the total, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) takes more of the criteria.
HireVue (Video interview) edges Juicebox (PeopleGPT) (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 58 to 57. Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads more of the criteria than HireVue — 4 to 2 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which HireVue leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HireVue. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireVue 65, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 52 — and at a 20% weight it carries 68% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Vendor profile
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
§ The record
HireVue is filed under Video interview AI, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HireVue is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireVue | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2004 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireVue 65 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 52
2.6 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireVue 60 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 50
1.2 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireVue 45 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55
1.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
18% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireVue 80 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84
0.7 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireVue 55 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 60
0.4 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireVue 55 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 56
0.1 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireVue minus Juicebox (PeopleGPT).
| Category | Weight | HireVue | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 52 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 84 | -4 | -0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 56 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 57 (F) | +1 | +1.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireVue | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue and Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains, and 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next