HomeCompareHireVue vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireVue vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

HireVue leads Talview on all 7 criteria.

HireVue finishes 16 points clear of Talview inside the Video interview cohort under rubric v1.0: 58 against 42. HireVue leads every one of the 7 criteria, Talview none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, HireVue 55 to Talview 52. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireVue 80, Talview 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HireVue and Talview are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act.

RecordHireVueTalview
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20042012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireVue 80 · Talview 38

    7.6 weighted points to HireVue

  2. 20% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireVue 65 · Talview 50

    3.0 weighted points to HireVue

  3. 12% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireVue 45 · Talview 32

    1.6 weighted points to HireVue

  4. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireVue 35 · Talview 25

    1.5 weighted points to HireVue

  5. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireVue 55 · Talview 48

    1.1 weighted points to HireVue

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireVue 60 · Talview 55

    0.6 weighted points to HireVue

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireVue 55 · Talview 52

    0.2 weighted points to HireVue

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +15.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireVue minus Talview.

CategoryWeightHireVueTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6550+15+3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%8038+42+7.6
FRIA Support15%3525+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5548+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%6055+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4532+13+1.6
Customer Documentation8%5552+3+0.2
Total100%58 (F)42 (F)+16+15.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireVueTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%132Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HireVue last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.