§ The result
HiringBranch leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
HiringBranch finishes 15 points clear of myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 52 against 37 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. HiringBranch leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; myInterview leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HiringBranch 60, myInterview 35, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 29% of the weighted advantage HiringBranch holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HiringBranch
HiringBranch is an AI skills-assessment platform that measures 50+ communication and soft skills from candidates' open-ended, conversational job-simulation responses (text and voice) to screen and rank applicants for customer-facing roles.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
HiringBranch is filed under Assessment AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HiringBranch | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | CA | AU |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiringBranch 60 · myInterview 35
4.5 weighted points to HiringBranch
20% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiringBranch 60 · myInterview 38
4.4 weighted points to HiringBranch
15% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiringBranch 55 · myInterview 42
1.9 weighted points to HiringBranch
8% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiringBranch 64 · myInterview 40
1.9 weighted points to HiringBranch
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiringBranch 35 · myInterview 25
1.5 weighted points to HiringBranch
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiringBranch 40 · myInterview 33
0.8 weighted points to HiringBranch
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiringBranch 52 · myInterview 48
0.5 weighted points to HiringBranch
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +15.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiringBranch minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | HiringBranch | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 42 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 48 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 40 | +24 | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 37 (F) | +15 | +15.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiringBranch | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
HiringBranch has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for HiringBranch, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiringBranch last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next