§ The result
Hogan Assessments leads Intervue.io by 16 points.
Hogan Assessments finishes 16 points clear of Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 31 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Hogan Assessments: Hogan Assessments is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Intervue.io on Human Oversight Design. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Hogan Assessments 44, Intervue.io 12, 18% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage Hogan Assessments builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Hogan Assessments
Hogan Assessments provides science-based personality assessments - chiefly the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), and Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) - used to predict workplace performance for employee selection and development.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
Hogan Assessments is filed under Assessment AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Hogan Assessments | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 1987 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Hogan Assessments 44 · Intervue.io 12
5.8 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
20% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Hogan Assessments 50 · Intervue.io 28
4.4 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Hogan Assessments 36 · Intervue.io 22
2.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Hogan Assessments 52 · Intervue.io 38
2.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Hogan Assessments 40 · Intervue.io 30
1.2 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Hogan Assessments 62 · Intervue.io 50
1.0 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Hogan Assessments 52 · Intervue.io 54
0.2 weighted points to Intervue.io
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +16.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Hogan Assessments minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | Hogan Assessments | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 28 | +22 | +4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 12 | +32 | +5.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 36 | 22 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 38 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 54 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 31 (F) | +16 | +16.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Hogan Assessments | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Hogan Assessments last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next