§ The result
iMocha leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between iMocha (Assessment) and Intervue.io (Video interview): 56 for iMocha, 31 for Intervue.io. iMocha leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Intervue.io leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (iMocha 68, Intervue.io 28, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 32% of the weighted advantage iMocha holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
iMocha is filed under Assessment AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | iMocha | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | IN |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
iMocha 68 · Intervue.io 28
8.0 weighted points to iMocha
18% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
iMocha 44 · Intervue.io 12
5.8 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
iMocha 66 · Intervue.io 38
4.2 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
iMocha 38 · Intervue.io 22
2.4 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
iMocha 48 · Intervue.io 30
2.2 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
iMocha 66 · Intervue.io 50
1.3 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
iMocha 64 · Intervue.io 54
1.2 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +25.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +25 beside that +25.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is iMocha minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | iMocha | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 68 | 28 | +40 | +8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 12 | +32 | +5.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 22 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 66 | 38 | +28 | +4.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 54 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 48 | 30 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 50 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 31 (F) | +25 | +25.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | iMocha | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for iMocha and Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next