Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
impress.ai vs Toggl Hire
impress.ai
impress.ai is a Singapore-headquartered recruitment automation platform that uses conversational AI assistants, resume parsing and scoring, and structured competency-based screening to filter, rank and shortlist job candidates, integrating with enterprise ATS systems.
Substantial gaps
Screening
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates impress.ai and Toggl Hire.
impress.ai holds a 1-point edge over Toggl Hire under rubric v1.0, 38 to 37, across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. impress.ai leads 3 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Toggl Hire leads 2, including FRIA Support, and 2 are level. impress.ai takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (impress.ai 35, Toggl Hire 30), which is 50% of the weighted advantage impress.ai holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Customer Documentation, impress.ai 58 to Toggl Hire 50.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- impress.ai3
- Toggl Hire2
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Customer Documentation58 vs 50
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
impress.ai is filed under Screening AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | impress.ai | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Low |
| Headquarters | SG | EE |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight32% of the movement so far
impress.ai35Toggl Hire301.0 weighted points to impress.ai
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight56% of the movement so far
impress.ai25Toggl Hire300.8 weighted points to Toggl Hire
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight77% of the movement so far
impress.ai58Toggl Hire500.6 weighted points to impress.ai
- 4
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight88% of the movement so far
impress.ai22Toggl Hire200.4 weighted points to impress.ai
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
impress.ai32Toggl Hire350.4 weighted points to Toggl Hire
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +0.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is impress.ai minus Toggl Hire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | impress.ai | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 20 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 52 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 38F | 37F | +1 | +0.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | impress.ai | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
impress.ai has 25 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 25 for impress.ai, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- impress.ai last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.