§ The result
Indeed leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Indeed finishes 19 points clear of Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 50 against 31 — across the Sourcing and Video interview cohorts. Indeed leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Intervue.io leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Indeed 58, Intervue.io 28, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Indeed holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Indeed
Job marketplace whose employer-side AI (the Talent Scout agent, Sourcing Assistant, Smart Screening and candidate matching) sources, ranks and scores candidates from Indeed's profile pool and applicant flow and drafts outreach to them.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
Indeed is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Indeed | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2004 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Indeed 58 · Intervue.io 28
6.0 weighted points to Indeed
18% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Indeed 38 · Intervue.io 12
4.7 weighted points to Indeed
15% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Indeed 58 · Intervue.io 38
3.0 weighted points to Indeed
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Indeed 38 · Intervue.io 22
2.4 weighted points to Indeed
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Indeed 40 · Intervue.io 30
1.2 weighted points to Indeed
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Indeed 64 · Intervue.io 50
1.1 weighted points to Indeed
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Indeed 63 · Intervue.io 54
1.1 weighted points to Indeed
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +19.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +19 beside that +19.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Indeed minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | Indeed | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 28 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 12 | +26 | +4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 22 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 38 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 54 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 50 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 50 (F) | 31 (F) | +19 | +19.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Indeed | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 2 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 36 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Indeed has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Indeed and Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 77 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Indeed, across 5 distinct source domains, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Indeed last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next