§ The result
Infor Talent Science leads RecruitBot on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Infor Talent Science sits 12 points above RecruitBot under rubric v1.0 — 49 against 37 — with Infor Talent Science filed under Assessment and RecruitBot under Sourcing. Infor Talent Science leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so RecruitBot is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Infor Talent Science leads is Post-Market Monitoring, Infor Talent Science 45 to RecruitBot 40. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Infor Talent Science 58, RecruitBot 33) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage Infor Talent Science holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Infor Talent Science
Infor Talent Science is a cloud-based pre-hire behavioral and cognitive assessment platform. It scores candidates against patented machine-learning 'Performance Profiles' built from the behavior and performance data of an employer's successful incumbents, and gives hiring teams fit scores, recommendations and interview questions that are used to rank and route applicants.
Vendor profile
RecruitBot
RecruitBot is an AI sourcing platform that searches a proprietary database of 655M+ candidate profiles, re-ranks results with machine learning trained on each recruiter's star ratings, and automates personalized email outreach.
§ The record
Infor Talent Science is filed under Assessment AI, RecruitBot under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Infor Talent Science is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Infor Talent Science | RecruitBot |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Infor Talent Science 58 · RecruitBot 33
5.0 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
18% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Infor Talent Science 42 · RecruitBot 22
3.6 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Infor Talent Science 57 · RecruitBot 48
1.3 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Infor Talent Science 35 · RecruitBot 27
1.2 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Infor Talent Science 45 · RecruitBot 40
0.6 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Infor Talent Science 60 · RecruitBot 55
0.4 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +12.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +12.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Infor Talent Science minus RecruitBot.
| Category | Weight | Infor Talent Science | RecruitBot | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 33 | +25 | +5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 22 | +20 | +3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 27 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 48 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 37 (F) | +12 | +12.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Infor Talent Science | RecruitBot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Infor Talent Science has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; RecruitBot has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for RecruitBot sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Infor Talent Science, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for RecruitBot, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Infor Talent Science last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- RecruitBot last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next