HomeCompareInfor Talent Science vs Stepstone

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Infor Talent Science vs Stepstone

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Infor Talent Science and Stepstone tie at 49.

Infor Talent Science (Assessment) and Stepstone (Screening) tie at 49 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Infor Talent Science leads 5 of the 7 criteria and Stepstone 2, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Infor Talent Science 42, Stepstone 50) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 60% of the weighted advantage Stepstone holds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Infor Talent Science is filed under Assessment AI, Stepstone under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Infor Talent Science is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordInfor Talent ScienceStepstone
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded20021996

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 29% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Infor Talent Science 42 · Stepstone 50

    1.4 weighted points to Stepstone

  2. 12% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Infor Talent Science 50 · Stepstone 58

    1.0 weighted points to Stepstone

  3. 12% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Infor Talent Science 45 · Stepstone 38

    0.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  4. 15% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Infor Talent Science 35 · Stepstone 30

    0.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  5. 20% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Infor Talent Science 58 · Stepstone 55

    0.6 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Infor Talent Science 57 · Stepstone 55

    0.3 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Infor Talent Science 60 · Stepstone 58

    0.2 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Infor Talent Science minus Stepstone.

CategoryWeightInfor Talent ScienceStepstoneΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5855+3+0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4250-8-1.4
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5755+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5058-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4538+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%49 (F)49 (F)-+0.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightInfor Talent ScienceStepstone
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%277Sources on the vendor's own domain294Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Infor Talent Science has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Stepstone has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Stepstone sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Infor Talent Science, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Stepstone, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Infor Talent Science last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Stepstone last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.