§ The result
Interviewer.AI leads Talogy by 5 points.
Interviewer.AI scores 47 and Talogy 42 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Video interview and Assessment cohorts. Interviewer.AI leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while Talogy leads 1, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 2 are level. FRIA Support is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Interviewer.AI 35, Talogy 25, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Vendor profile
Talogy
Talogy sells psychometric talent-assessment products - cognitive ability tests (Logiks, Mindgage), personality inventories (Caliper, P.A.P.I.), values-based screening, situational judgement and job simulations, and 360 feedback - delivered through its TalogyTech platform for candidate selection and employee development.
§ The record
Interviewer.AI is filed under Video interview AI, Talogy under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Interviewer.AI | Talogy |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | SG | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 1946 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 32% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Interviewer.AI 35 · Talogy 25
1.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Interviewer.AI 60 · Talogy 52
1.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Interviewer.AI 60 · Talogy 52
1.0 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
18% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Interviewer.AI 35 · Talogy 30
0.9 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Interviewer.AI 52 · Talogy 53
0.2 weighted points to Talogy
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +4.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Interviewer.AI minus Talogy.
| Category | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Talogy | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 53 | -1 | -0.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 32 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 42 (F) | +5 | +4.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Talogy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 22 | 9 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Talogy has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for Talogy, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talogy last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next