§ The result
2 points separate Intervue.io and JobDiva.
Intervue.io (Video interview) edges JobDiva (ATS-integrated) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 31 to 29. JobDiva takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 2 for Intervue.io, whose share includes Human Oversight Design, and 4 are level. One criterion, Human Oversight Design, is both the widest raw gap (Intervue.io 54, JobDiva 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 12% weight it makes up 72% of the weighted advantage Intervue.io holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · JobDiva 40
1.7 weighted points to Intervue.io
8% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · JobDiva 42
0.6 weighted points to Intervue.io
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · JobDiva 15
0.5 weighted points to JobDiva
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 3 figures above sum to +1.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +1.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 15 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 22 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 38 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 40 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 42 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 29 (F) | +2 | +1.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next