§ The result
Jobma leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Jobma finishes 18 points clear of Intervue.io inside the Video interview cohort under rubric v1.0: 49 against 31. Jobma takes all 7 criteria and Intervue.io none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, Intervue.io 54 to Jobma 60. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (Intervue.io 12, Jobma 40) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Intervue.io 28, Jobma 55), 29% of the weighted advantage Jobma builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
§ The record
Intervue.io and Jobma are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Assessment.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Jobma |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Jobma 55
5.4 weighted points to Jobma
18% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Jobma 40
5.0 weighted points to Jobma
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Jobma 56
2.7 weighted points to Jobma
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Jobma 35
1.9 weighted points to Jobma
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Jobma 44
1.7 weighted points to Jobma
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Jobma 62
1.0 weighted points to Jobma
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Jobma 60
0.7 weighted points to Jobma
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -18.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Jobma.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Jobma | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 55 | -27 | -5.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 40 | -28 | -5.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 60 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 44 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 49 (F) | -18 | -18.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Jobma | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 17 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobma last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next