§ The result
LinkedIn Recruiter leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
LinkedIn Recruiter (Sourcing) and Intervue.io (Video interview) are 26 points apart under rubric v1.0, 57 for LinkedIn Recruiter against 31 for Intervue.io. Intervue.io leads none of the 7 criteria, and LinkedIn Recruiter is ahead on 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. The advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 28, LinkedIn Recruiter 67, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 30% of the weighted points LinkedIn Recruiter gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
LinkedIn Recruiter
LinkedIn Recruiter is LinkedIn's enterprise sourcing and candidate-management platform, whose Hiring Assistant add-on and AI-Assisted Search use AI to turn intake notes into qualifications, source and rank candidates, evaluate applicants against recruiter-set qualifications, and draft or send outreach.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | LinkedIn Recruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2002 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67
7.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
18% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
6.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
15% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62
3.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38
2.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
2.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66
1.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68
1.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -26 beside that -25.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus LinkedIn Recruiter.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | LinkedIn Recruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 67 | -39 | -7.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 50 | -38 | -6.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 62 | -24 | -3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 66 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 50 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 68 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 57 (F) | -26 | -25.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | LinkedIn Recruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 34 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 76 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next