§ The result
Maki People leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Maki People (Assessment) and Intervue.io (Video interview) are 36 points apart under rubric v1.0, 67 (D) for Maki People against 31 (F) for Intervue.io. Intervue.io leads none of the 7 criteria, and Maki People is ahead on 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage Maki People holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 12, Maki People 80, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 34% of the weighted points Maki People gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | FR |
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Maki People 80
12.2 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Maki People 64
7.2 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Maki People 62
6.0 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Maki People 64
3.9 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Maki People 55
3.0 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Maki People 74
1.9 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Maki People 66
1.4 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -35.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 35.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -36 beside that -35.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 64 | -36 | -7.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 80 | -68 | -12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 62 | -40 | -6.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 64 | -26 | -3.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 66 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 55 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 74 | -24 | -1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 67 (D) | -36 | -35.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next