§ The result
Mercer | Mettl leads Intervue.io by 11 points.
Mercer | Mettl sits 11 points above Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 42 against 31 — with Mercer | Mettl filed under Assessment and Intervue.io under Video interview. Mercer | Mettl leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Intervue.io leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Intervue.io 12, Mercer | Mettl 42) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 45% of the weighted advantage Mercer | Mettl holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Mercer | Mettl
Mercer | Mettl is an online talent assessment and remote-proctoring platform offering psychometric, aptitude, coding, and skills tests plus AI-assisted exam proctoring and scoring for hiring, certification, and L&D.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Mercer | Mettl under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Mercer | Mettl |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | IN |
| Founded | 2020 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Mercer | Mettl 42
5.4 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
15% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Mercer | Mettl 55
2.5 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Mercer | Mettl 38
2.0 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Mercer | Mettl 45
1.1 weighted points to Intervue.io
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Mercer | Mettl 38
1.0 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Mercer | Mettl 28
0.9 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Mercer | Mettl 52
0.2 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -10.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Mercer | Mettl.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Mercer | Mettl | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 42 | -30 | -5.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 45 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 42 (F) | -11 | -10.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Mercer | Mettl | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Mercer | Mettl has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Mercer | Mettl, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Mercer | Mettl last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next