§ The result
Intervue.io leads Mercor on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Intervue.io, filed under Video interview, finishes on 31 and Mercor, filed under Screening, on 23, 8 points apart. Intervue.io takes all 7 criteria from Mercor without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Bias Audit Transparency, Intervue.io 12 to Mercor 10. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Intervue.io 38, Mercor 22, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Intervue.io holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Mercor
Mercor is an AI talent platform that runs automated 20-minute AI video interviews and semantic resume/profile matching to vet, score, and place candidates and expert contractors, and offers an enterprise applicant-screening product that scores employers' applicant pools against role rubrics with pass/fail recommendations.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Mercor under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Mercor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Mercor 22
2.4 weighted points to Intervue.io
12% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Mercor 42
1.4 weighted points to Intervue.io
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Mercor 22
1.2 weighted points to Intervue.io
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Mercor 20
1.2 weighted points to Intervue.io
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Mercor 40
0.8 weighted points to Intervue.io
18% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Mercor 10
0.4 weighted points to Intervue.io
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Mercor 20
0.3 weighted points to Intervue.io
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +7.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Mercor.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Mercor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 22 | +6 | +1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 10 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 20 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 22 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 42 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 20 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 40 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 23 (F) | +8 | +7.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Mercor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Mercor has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 16 for Mercor, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Mercor last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next