§ The result
PageUp leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
PageUp (ATS-integrated) and Intervue.io (Video interview) are 33 points apart under rubric v1.0, 64 (D) for PageUp against 31 (F) for Intervue.io. Intervue.io leads none of the 7 criteria, and PageUp is ahead on 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage PageUp holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 12, PageUp 80, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 37% of the weighted points PageUp gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | AU |
| Founded | 2020 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · PageUp 80
12.2 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · PageUp 74
9.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · PageUp 63
3.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · PageUp 55
3.0 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · PageUp 40
2.7 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · PageUp 64
1.2 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · PageUp 63
1.0 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -33.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 33.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -33 beside that -33.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 74 | -46 | -9.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 80 | -68 | -12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 40 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 63 | -25 | -3.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 64 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 55 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 63 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 64 (D) | -33 | -33.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next