§ The result
Paycor leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Paycor, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 40 and Intervue.io, filed under Video interview, on 31, 9 points apart. Paycor takes all 7 criteria from Intervue.io without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Human Oversight Design, Intervue.io 54 to Paycor 55. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (Intervue.io 12, Paycor 25) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Intervue.io 28, Paycor 40), the second being 27% of the weighted advantage Paycor holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Paycor
Paycor, a Paychex company, sells a mid-market HR and payroll suite whose recruiting tools include the Paycor Recruiting ATS, Paycor Smart Sourcing (formerly Talenya), which uses AI to build a prioritized list of passive and active candidates for each role and automate outreach, and a WISE assistant that phone-screens candidates and scores their answers.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Paycor under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | Paycor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 1990 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Paycor 40
2.4 weighted points to Paycor
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Paycor 25
2.3 weighted points to Paycor
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Paycor 50
1.8 weighted points to Paycor
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Paycor 38
1.0 weighted points to Paycor
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Paycor 27
0.8 weighted points to Paycor
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Paycor 55
0.4 weighted points to Paycor
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Paycor 55
0.1 weighted points to Paycor
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Paycor.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Paycor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 25 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 27 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 50 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 40 (F) | -9 | -8.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Paycor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Paycor has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and Paycor sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 30 for Paycor, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Paycor last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next