§ The result
Paylocity leads Intervue.io by 12 points.
Paylocity, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 12 points above Intervue.io, filed under Video interview: 43 against 31 under rubric v1.0. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Paylocity: Paylocity is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Intervue.io on Human Oversight Design. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 12, Paylocity 33, 18% weight), is only 30% of the weighted advantage Paylocity builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Paylocity
Paylocity is a cloud-based HCM and payroll platform whose talent suite includes an applicant tracking system with generative-AI job-description and invite drafting, one-way video interviews, candidate self-scheduling, and a conversational "AI Assistant."
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Paylocity under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Paylocity |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Paylocity 33
3.8 weighted points to Paylocity
20% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Paylocity 44
3.2 weighted points to Paylocity
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Paylocity 54
2.4 weighted points to Paylocity
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Paylocity 42
1.4 weighted points to Paylocity
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Paylocity 30
1.2 weighted points to Paylocity
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Paylocity 58
0.6 weighted points to Paylocity
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Paylocity 50
0.5 weighted points to Intervue.io
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -12.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Paylocity.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Paylocity | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 44 | -16 | -3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 33 | -21 | -3.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 54 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 50 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 58 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 43 (F) | -12 | -12.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Paylocity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Paylocity has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Paylocity, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Paylocity last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next