§ The result
Pinpoint leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 26 points between Pinpoint (ATS-integrated) and Intervue.io (Video interview): 57 for Pinpoint, 31 for Intervue.io. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Intervue.io leads none. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 28, Pinpoint 72, 20% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | JE |
| Founded | 2020 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Pinpoint 72
8.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Pinpoint 42
5.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Pinpoint 68
4.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Pinpoint 52
2.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Pinpoint 38
2.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Pinpoint 66
1.3 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Pinpoint 64
1.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -26.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -26 beside that -26.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 72 | -44 | -8.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 42 | -30 | -5.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 68 | -30 | -4.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 64 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 66 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 57 (F) | -26 | -26.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next