§ The result
Plum leads Intervue.io by 23 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Plum (Assessment) opens a 23-point lead on Intervue.io (Video interview), 54 to 31. Plum leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Intervue.io leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Intervue.io 12, Plum 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 54% of the weighted advantage Plum holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Plum
Plum is a pre-employment talent assessment platform that uses a Five-Factor (Big Five) psychometric Discovery Survey and a Talent Match model to score and rank candidates on behavioral "durable skills" for role fit, hiring, and development.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Plum under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Plum |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | CA |
| Founded | 2020 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Plum 83
12.8 weighted points to Plum
20% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Plum 58
6.0 weighted points to Plum
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Plum 54
2.4 weighted points to Plum
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Plum 63
1.0 weighted points to Plum
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Plum 28
0.9 weighted points to Plum
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Plum 36
0.7 weighted points to Plum
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Plum 52
0.2 weighted points to Intervue.io
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -23.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -23.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Plum.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Plum | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 58 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 83 | -71 | -12.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 54 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 52 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 36 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 63 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 54 (F) | -23 | -23.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Plum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 15 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Plum has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Plum, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Plum last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next