§ The result
Recruit CRM leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Recruit CRM scores 40 and Intervue.io 31 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Recruit CRM is ahead of Intervue.io on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Human Oversight Design at Intervue.io 54 to Recruit CRM 58. The advantage Recruit CRM holds is spread out: Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 38, Recruit CRM 54, 15% weight), yet it supplies only 25% of the weighted points Recruit CRM gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM is an ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies and executive search firms, with AI resume parsing, AI sourcing from an 800M+ profile Global Database, and AI candidate matching that scores and ranks candidates 0–100 with explanations for each dimension.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | Recruit CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 25% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Recruit CRM 54
2.4 weighted points to Recruit CRM
15% weight · 44% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Recruit CRM 34
1.8 weighted points to Recruit CRM
18% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Recruit CRM 20
1.4 weighted points to Recruit CRM
12% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Recruit CRM 42
1.4 weighted points to Recruit CRM
20% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Recruit CRM 34
1.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Recruit CRM 60
0.8 weighted points to Recruit CRM
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Recruit CRM 58
0.5 weighted points to Recruit CRM
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Recruit CRM.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Recruit CRM | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 34 | -6 | -1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 20 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 34 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 54 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 58 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 40 (F) | -9 | -9.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Recruit CRM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruit CRM last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next