§ The result
SHL leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
SHL finishes 20 points clear of Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 51 against 31 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. SHL leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Intervue.io leads none. The advantage SHL holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 12, SHL 50, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 34% of the weighted points SHL gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
SHL
SHL is a global talent-assessment provider offering AI-scored cognitive ability, personality, behavioral, situational-judgement, coding, and video-interview assessments that score, rank, and recommend candidates for hiring and development decisions.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, SHL under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | SHL |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | GB |
| Founded | 2020 | 1977 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · SHL 50
6.8 weighted points to SHL
20% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · SHL 60
6.4 weighted points to SHL
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · SHL 58
3.0 weighted points to SHL
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · SHL 30
1.2 weighted points to SHL
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · SHL 40
1.2 weighted points to SHL
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · SHL 60
0.8 weighted points to SHL
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · SHL 58
0.5 weighted points to SHL
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -19.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus SHL.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | SHL | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 60 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 50 | -38 | -6.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 58 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 58 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 51 (F) | -20 | -19.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | SHL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 15 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SHL has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for SHL, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SHL last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next