§ The result
SmartRecruiters leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 31 points between SmartRecruiters (ATS-integrated) and Intervue.io (Video interview): 62 (D) for SmartRecruiters, 31 (F) for Intervue.io. SmartRecruiters leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Intervue.io leads none. The advantage SmartRecruiters holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 12, SmartRecruiters 78, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points SmartRecruiters gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
SmartRecruiters
SmartRecruiters is an enterprise applicant tracking system and talent acquisition suite whose AI layer (the Winston assistant plus SmartAssistant/Winston Match) screens, ranks, and matches candidates to requisitions to support recruiter decisions.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, SmartRecruiters under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · SmartRecruiters 78
11.9 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
20% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · SmartRecruiters 70
8.4 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · SmartRecruiters 62
3.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · SmartRecruiters 45
3.4 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · SmartRecruiters 48
2.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · SmartRecruiters 63
1.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · SmartRecruiters 62
1.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -31.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 31.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -31 beside that -31.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus SmartRecruiters.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | SmartRecruiters | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 70 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 78 | -66 | -11.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 45 | -23 | -3.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 62 | -24 | -3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 62 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 48 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 63 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 62 (D) | -31 | -31.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | SmartRecruiters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SmartRecruiters last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.