§ The result
Sova Assessment leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Sova Assessment (Assessment) opens a 17-point lead on Intervue.io (Video interview), 48 to 31. Sova Assessment takes all 7 criteria and Intervue.io none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, Intervue.io 54 to Sova Assessment 55. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Intervue.io 28, Sova Assessment 55, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Sova Assessment holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Sova Assessment
Sova Assessment is a UK-based enterprise talent assessment platform combining personality questionnaires, cognitive and ability tests, situational judgement, video interviews, virtual assessment centres and AI-led role simulations into a single occupational-psychology-validated candidate scoring workflow.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Sova Assessment under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Sova Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | IN | GB |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Sova Assessment 55
5.4 weighted points to Sova Assessment
18% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Sova Assessment 38
4.7 weighted points to Sova Assessment
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Sova Assessment 40
2.7 weighted points to Sova Assessment
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Sova Assessment 52
2.1 weighted points to Sova Assessment
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Sova Assessment 40
1.2 weighted points to Sova Assessment
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Sova Assessment 62
1.0 weighted points to Sova Assessment
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Sova Assessment 55
0.1 weighted points to Sova Assessment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -17.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Sova Assessment.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Sova Assessment | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 55 | -27 | -5.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 38 | -26 | -4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 40 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 48 (F) | -17 | -17.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Sova Assessment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Sova Assessment has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and Sova Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 71 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Sova Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sova Assessment last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next