§ The result
Textkernel leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Textkernel (Sourcing) opens a 20-point lead on Intervue.io (Video interview), 51 to 31. Of the 7 criteria Intervue.io wins none, and the narrowest lead Textkernel holds is on Human Oversight Design, Intervue.io 54 to Textkernel 60. The advantage Textkernel holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 12, Textkernel 55, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 39% of the weighted points Textkernel gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Textkernel
Textkernel provides AI-powered CV/resume and job parsing, semantic search, and candidate-job matching technology (including the acquired Sovren engine) embedded inside ATS, job board, and HR systems.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Textkernel under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | Textkernel |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | NL |
| Founded | 2020 | 2001 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Textkernel 55
7.7 weighted points to Textkernel
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Textkernel 55
5.4 weighted points to Textkernel
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Textkernel 55
2.5 weighted points to Textkernel
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Textkernel 32
1.5 weighted points to Textkernel
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Textkernel 40
1.2 weighted points to Textkernel
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Textkernel 62
1.0 weighted points to Textkernel
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Textkernel 60
0.7 weighted points to Textkernel
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -20.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Textkernel.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Textkernel | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 55 | -27 | -5.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 55 | -43 | -7.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 32 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 60 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 51 (F) | -20 | -20.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Textkernel | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Textkernel has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Textkernel, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Textkernel last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next