§ The result
Toggl Hire leads Intervue.io by 6 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Toggl Hire, filed under Assessment, finishes on 37 and Intervue.io, filed under Video interview, on 31, 6 points apart. Toggl Hire leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while Intervue.io leads 1, including Human Oversight Design, and 1 is level. Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Intervue.io 38, Toggl Hire 55 — and at a 15% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage Toggl Hire holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | IN | EE |
| Founded | 2020 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Toggl Hire 55
2.5 weighted points to Toggl Hire
18% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Toggl Hire 20
1.4 weighted points to Toggl Hire
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Toggl Hire 30
1.2 weighted points to Toggl Hire
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Toggl Hire 35
0.6 weighted points to Toggl Hire
20% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Toggl Hire 30
0.4 weighted points to Toggl Hire
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Toggl Hire 52
0.2 weighted points to Intervue.io
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -5.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 20 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 52 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 37 (F) | -6 | -5.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next