§ The result
Tribepad leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between Tribepad (ATS-integrated) and Intervue.io (Video interview): 56 for Tribepad, 31 for Intervue.io. Tribepad leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Intervue.io leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Intervue.io 12, Tribepad 78) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 47% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Tribepad
Tribepad is a UK applicant tracking system whose built-in Sidekick AI assistant scores and ranks applicants against recruiter-weighted skills and generates candidate summaries, SWOT analyses, job descriptions, salary suggestions and interview questions.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Tribepad under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | Tribepad |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | GB |
| Founded | 2020 | 2008 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Tribepad 78
11.9 weighted points to Tribepad
20% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Tribepad 56
5.6 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Tribepad 54
2.9 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Tribepad 56
2.7 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Tribepad 30
1.2 weighted points to Tribepad
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Tribepad 58
0.6 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Tribepad 58
0.5 weighted points to Tribepad
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -25.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Tribepad.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Tribepad | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 56 | -28 | -5.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 78 | -66 | -11.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 58 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 54 | -24 | -2.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 58 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 56 (F) | -25 | -25.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Tribepad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tribepad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next