§ The result
Willo leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Willo sits 10 points above Intervue.io under rubric v1.0, 41 against 31, with both filed under Video interview. Willo is ahead of Intervue.io on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at Intervue.io 22 to Willo 25. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Intervue.io 12, Willo 30, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Willo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
§ The record
Intervue.io and Willo are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Assessment.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | IN | GB |
| Founded | 2020 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Willo 30
3.2 weighted points to Willo
15% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Willo 53
2.3 weighted points to Willo
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Willo 38
2.0 weighted points to Willo
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Willo 62
1.0 weighted points to Willo
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Willo 36
0.7 weighted points to Willo
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Willo 25
0.4 weighted points to Willo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Willo 54
0.3 weighted points to Willo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Willo.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 30 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 53 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 62 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 36 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 54 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 41 (F) | -10 | -9.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next