§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between Workday Recruiting AI (ATS-integrated) and Intervue.io (Video interview): 56 for Workday Recruiting AI, 31 for Intervue.io. Of the 7 criteria Intervue.io wins none, and the narrowest lead Workday Recruiting AI holds is on Post-Market Monitoring, Intervue.io 30 to Workday Recruiting AI 35. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Intervue.io 12, Workday Recruiting AI 60, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 35% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
8.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
20% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
8.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
2.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.9 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.3 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -24.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -24.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 70 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 60 | -48 | -8.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 65 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 65 | -15 | -1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 56 (F) | -25 | -24.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.