§ The result
RecruitBot leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, RecruitBot, filed under Sourcing, finishes on 37 and JobDiva, filed under ATS-integrated, on 29, 8 points apart. RecruitBot takes all 7 criteria from JobDiva without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Article 11 Technical Documentation, JobDiva 28 to RecruitBot 33. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (JobDiva 42, RecruitBot 55) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (JobDiva 38, RecruitBot 48), the second being 19% of the weighted advantage RecruitBot holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
RecruitBot
RecruitBot is an AI sourcing platform that searches a proprietary database of 655M+ candidate profiles, re-ranks results with machine learning trained on each recruiter's star ratings, and automates personalized email outreach.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, RecruitBot under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | JobDiva | RecruitBot |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 19% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · RecruitBot 48
1.5 weighted points to RecruitBot
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · RecruitBot 22
1.3 weighted points to RecruitBot
12% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · RecruitBot 50
1.2 weighted points to RecruitBot
12% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · RecruitBot 40
1.2 weighted points to RecruitBot
8% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · RecruitBot 55
1.0 weighted points to RecruitBot
20% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · RecruitBot 33
1.0 weighted points to RecruitBot
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · RecruitBot 27
0.8 weighted points to RecruitBot
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus RecruitBot.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | RecruitBot | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 33 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 22 | -7 | -1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 27 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 48 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 50 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 37 (F) | -8 | -8.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | RecruitBot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; RecruitBot has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for RecruitBot sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for RecruitBot, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- RecruitBot last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next