§ The result
Talogy leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Talogy sits 13 points above JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 42 against 29 — with Talogy filed under Assessment and JobDiva under ATS-integrated. Talogy takes all 7 criteria and JobDiva none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, JobDiva 30 to Talogy 32. The advantage Talogy holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 28, Talogy 53, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points Talogy gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Talogy
Talogy sells psychometric talent-assessment products - cognitive ability tests (Logiks, Mindgage), personality inventories (Caliper, P.A.P.I.), values-based screening, situational judgement and job simulations, and 360 feedback - delivered through its TalogyTech platform for candidate selection and employee development.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Talogy under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Talogy is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Talogy |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 1946 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Talogy 53
5.0 weighted points to Talogy
18% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Talogy 30
2.7 weighted points to Talogy
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Talogy 52
2.1 weighted points to Talogy
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Talogy 52
1.4 weighted points to Talogy
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Talogy 58
1.3 weighted points to Talogy
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Talogy 25
0.4 weighted points to Talogy
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Talogy 32
0.2 weighted points to Talogy
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -13.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Talogy.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Talogy | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 53 | -25 | -5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 30 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 32 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 42 (F) | -13 | -13.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Talogy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 22 | 9 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Talogy has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for Talogy, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talogy last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next