§ The result
Talview leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Talview sits 13 points above JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 42 against 29 — with Talview filed under Video interview and JobDiva under ATS-integrated. Of the 7 criteria JobDiva wins none, and the narrowest lead Talview holds is on Post-Market Monitoring, JobDiva 30 to Talview 32. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (JobDiva 15, Talview 38) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (JobDiva 28, Talview 50), 33% of the weighted advantage Talview builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Talview
AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Talview is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Talview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Talview 50
4.4 weighted points to Talview
18% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Talview 38
4.1 weighted points to Talview
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Talview 55
1.8 weighted points to Talview
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Talview 48
1.5 weighted points to Talview
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Talview 52
0.8 weighted points to Talview
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Talview 25
0.4 weighted points to Talview
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Talview 32
0.2 weighted points to Talview
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -13.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Talview.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Talview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 50 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 38 | -23 | -4.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 48 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 32 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 42 (F) | -13 | -13.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Talview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next