§ The result
Testlify leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Testlify finishes 16 points clear of JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 45 against 29 — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Of the 7 criteria JobDiva wins none, and the narrowest lead Testlify holds is on FRIA Support, JobDiva 22 to Testlify 33. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 28, Testlify 52, 20% weight), is only 29% of the weighted advantage Testlify builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Testlify
Testlify is a skills-assessment and AI-interviewing platform that ranks candidates on a scored leaderboard from pre-built or AI-generated tests, with an AI résumé screener, AI-scored video, voice and chat interviews, and AI-assisted proctoring.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Testlify under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Testlify is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Testlify |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Testlify 52
4.8 weighted points to Testlify
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Testlify 30
2.7 weighted points to Testlify
15% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Testlify 55
2.5 weighted points to Testlify
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Testlify 55
1.8 weighted points to Testlify
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Testlify 33
1.6 weighted points to Testlify
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Testlify 42
1.4 weighted points to Testlify
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Testlify 60
1.4 weighted points to Testlify
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -16.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Testlify.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Testlify | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 52 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 30 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 33 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 45 (F) | -16 | -16.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Testlify | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 31 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Testlify has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 36 for Testlify, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Testlify last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next