§ The result
Willo leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Willo, filed under Video interview, comes out 12 points above JobDiva, filed under ATS-integrated: 41 against 29 under rubric v1.0. Of the 7 criteria JobDiva wins none, and the narrowest lead Willo holds is on FRIA Support, JobDiva 22 to Willo 25. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (JobDiva 40, Willo 62) and Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (JobDiva 15, Willo 30), the second being 23% of the weighted advantage Willo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Willo is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2003 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 23% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Willo 30
2.7 weighted points to Willo
12% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Willo 62
2.6 weighted points to Willo
15% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Willo 53
2.3 weighted points to Willo
20% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Willo 38
2.0 weighted points to Willo
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Willo 54
1.0 weighted points to Willo
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Willo 36
0.7 weighted points to Willo
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Willo 25
0.4 weighted points to Willo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Willo.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 30 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 53 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 62 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 36 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 54 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 41 (F) | -12 | -11.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next