§ The result
X0PA AI leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, X0PA AI (Assessment) opens a 19-point lead on JobDiva (ATS-integrated), 48 to 29. X0PA AI takes all 7 criteria and JobDiva none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, JobDiva 30 to X0PA AI 40. The advantage X0PA AI holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 15, X0PA AI 44, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 27% of the weighted points X0PA AI gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
X0PA AI
X0PA AI is a Singapore-based B2B AI recruitment platform (applicant tracking system) that sources, screens, scores, and ranks candidates using proprietary predictive-scoring models (BRIQ Score and Suitability Score) plus the X0PA ROOM video-interview/assessment product, marketed around bias-reduced, "responsible and explainable" AI hiring.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, X0PA AI under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only X0PA AI is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | X0PA AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2003 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · X0PA AI 44
5.2 weighted points to X0PA AI
20% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · X0PA AI 50
4.4 weighted points to X0PA AI
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · X0PA AI 56
2.7 weighted points to X0PA AI
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · X0PA AI 38
2.4 weighted points to X0PA AI
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · X0PA AI 57
2.0 weighted points to X0PA AI
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · X0PA AI 60
1.4 weighted points to X0PA AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · X0PA AI 40
1.2 weighted points to X0PA AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -19.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus X0PA AI.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | X0PA AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 50 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 44 | -29 | -5.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 57 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 48 (F) | -19 | -19.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | X0PA AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; X0PA AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for X0PA AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for X0PA AI, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- X0PA AI last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next