Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
JobDiva vs Zappyhire
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Zappyhire
Zappyhire is an AI-powered recruitment automation platform that screens and ranks candidates through resume parsing, a recruiting chatbot, AI assessments, and robotic video interviews, layered on an applicant tracking system.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Zappyhire leads JobDiva by 5 points.
Zappyhire scores 34 and JobDiva 29 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Screening and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Zappyhire: Zappyhire is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and JobDiva on Post-Market Monitoring. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (JobDiva 15, Zappyhire 28) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 45% of the weighted advantage Zappyhire holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- JobDiva1
- Zappyhire6
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency15 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Zappyhire under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Zappyhire is in scope of
| Record | JobDiva | Zappyhire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2003 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight43% of the movement so far
JobDiva15Zappyhire282.3 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight65% of the movement so far
JobDiva40Zappyhire501.2 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight76% of the movement so far
JobDiva38Zappyhire420.6 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight84% of the movement so far
JobDiva22Zappyhire250.4 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight91% of the movement so far
JobDiva28Zappyhire300.4 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight96% of the movement so far
JobDiva30Zappyhire280.2 weighted points to JobDiva
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
JobDiva42Zappyhire450.2 weighted points to Zappyhire
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Zappyhire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Zappyhire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 28 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 42 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 50 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 29F | 34F | -5 | -5.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Zappyhire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Zappyhire has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Zappyhire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Zappyhire, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Zappyhire last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.