§ The result
Zappyhire leads JobDiva by 5 points.
Zappyhire scores 34 and JobDiva 29 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Screening and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Zappyhire: Zappyhire is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and JobDiva on Post-Market Monitoring. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (JobDiva 15, Zappyhire 28) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 45% of the weighted advantage Zappyhire holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Zappyhire
Zappyhire is an AI-powered recruitment automation platform that screens and ranks candidates through resume parsing, a recruiting chatbot, AI assessments, and robotic video interviews, layered on an applicant tracking system.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Zappyhire under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Zappyhire is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Zappyhire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2003 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Zappyhire 28
2.3 weighted points to Zappyhire
12% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Zappyhire 50
1.2 weighted points to Zappyhire
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Zappyhire 42
0.6 weighted points to Zappyhire
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Zappyhire 25
0.4 weighted points to Zappyhire
20% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Zappyhire 30
0.4 weighted points to Zappyhire
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Zappyhire 28
0.2 weighted points to JobDiva
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Zappyhire 45
0.2 weighted points to Zappyhire
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Zappyhire.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Zappyhire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 28 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 42 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 50 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 34 (F) | -5 | -5.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Zappyhire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Zappyhire has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Zappyhire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Zappyhire, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Zappyhire last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next