Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Jobma vs Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
Vendor profile
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobma minus Juicebox (PeopleGPT).
| Category | Weight | Jobma | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 52 | +3 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 84 | -44 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 35 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 56 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 50 | +10 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 55 | -11 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 57 (F) | -8 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Jobma
21 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- absence
- 4
- public statement
- 4
Evidence count
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
16 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 8
- absence
- 4
- audit report
- 3
- public statement
- 1