Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Jobma vs Mercer | Mettl
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
Vendor profile
Mercer | Mettl
Mercer | Mettl is an online talent assessment and remote-proctoring platform offering psychometric, aptitude, coding, and skills tests plus AI-assisted exam proctoring and scoring for hiring, certification, and L&D.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobma minus Mercer | Mettl.
| Category | Weight | Jobma | Mercer | Mettl | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 38 | +17 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 42 | -2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 28 | +7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 55 | +1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 45 | +15 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 38 | +6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 52 | +10 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 42 (F) | +7 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Jobma
21 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- absence
- 4
- public statement
- 4
Evidence count
Mercer | Mettl
14 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 7
- absence
- 5
- public statement
- 2