Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Jobma vs Paradox
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
49
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
41
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobma minus Paradox.
| Category | Weight | Jobma | Paradox | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 40 | +15 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 50 | -10 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 45 | +11 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 50 | +10 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 35 | +9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 45 | +17 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 41 (F) | +8 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Jobma
21 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- absence
- 4
- public statement
- 4
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2