§ The result
Pinpoint leads Jobma on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint scores 57 and Jobma 49 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Pinpoint is ahead of Jobma on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Bias Audit Transparency at Jobma 40 to Pinpoint 42. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Jobma 55, Pinpoint 72 — and at a 20% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
Jobma is filed under Video interview AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Jobma is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Jobma | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Jobma 55 · Pinpoint 72
3.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Jobma 56 · Pinpoint 68
1.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Jobma 44 · Pinpoint 52
1.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Jobma 60 · Pinpoint 64
0.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Jobma 35 · Pinpoint 38
0.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Jobma 40 · Pinpoint 42
0.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Jobma 62 · Pinpoint 66
0.3 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -7.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -7.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobma minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Jobma | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 72 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 68 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 52 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 57 (F) | -8 | -7.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Jobma | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 17 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Jobma last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next