Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Jobma vs Plum
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
Vendor profile
Plum
Plum is a pre-employment talent assessment platform that uses a Five-Factor (Big Five) psychometric Discovery Survey and a Talent Match model to score and rank candidates on behavioral "durable skills" for role fit, hiring, and development.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobma minus Plum.
| Category | Weight | Jobma | Plum | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 58 | -3 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 83 | -43 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 28 | +7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 54 | +2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 52 | +8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 36 | +8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 63 | -1 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 54 (F) | -5 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Jobma
21 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- absence
- 4
- public statement
- 4
Evidence count
Plum
19 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 12
- audit report
- 3
- absence
- 4