§ The result
Jobma leads Talview on all 7 criteria.
Jobma scores 49 and Talview 42 under rubric v1.0 — a 7-point gap inside the Video interview cohort. Jobma is ahead of Talview on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Bias Audit Transparency at Jobma 40 to Talview 38. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (Jobma 44, Talview 32) and FRIA Support at 15% (Jobma 35, Talview 25), the second being 22% of the weighted advantage Jobma holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
Vendor profile
Talview
AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.
§ The record
Jobma and Talview are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Assessment and Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Jobma | Talview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 22% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Jobma 35 · Talview 25
1.5 weighted points to Jobma
12% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Jobma 44 · Talview 32
1.4 weighted points to Jobma
15% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Jobma 56 · Talview 48
1.2 weighted points to Jobma
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Jobma 55 · Talview 50
1.0 weighted points to Jobma
8% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Jobma 62 · Talview 52
0.8 weighted points to Jobma
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Jobma 60 · Talview 55
0.6 weighted points to Jobma
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Jobma 40 · Talview 38
0.4 weighted points to Jobma
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +6.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +6.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobma minus Talview.
| Category | Weight | Jobma | Talview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 48 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 32 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 42 (F) | +7 | +6.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Jobma | Talview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 17 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Jobma last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next