Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Jobma vs Thomas International
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
Vendor profile
Thomas International
Thomas International provides psychometric and aptitude assessments (behaviour/DISC, cognitive ability, personality and emotional intelligence) with an AI coaching layer, used for hiring, candidate selection and employee development.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobma minus Thomas International.
| Category | Weight | Jobma | Thomas International | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 54 | +1 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 43 | -3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 33 | +2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 57 | -1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 51 | +9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 40 | +4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 48 (F) | +1 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Jobma
21 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- absence
- 4
- public statement
- 4
Evidence count
Thomas International
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- absence
- 6