§ The result
Jobma leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Jobma sits 13 points above Turing under rubric v1.0 — 49 against 36 — with Jobma filed under Video interview and Turing under Assessment. Jobma is ahead of Turing on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at Jobma 35 to Turing 25. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (Jobma 44, Turing 27) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Jobma 55, Turing 42), the second being 20% of the weighted advantage Jobma holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
Jobma is filed under Video interview AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Jobma | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 20% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Jobma 55 · Turing 42
2.6 weighted points to Jobma
18% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Jobma 40 · Turing 28
2.2 weighted points to Jobma
12% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Jobma 44 · Turing 27
2.0 weighted points to Jobma
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Jobma 56 · Turing 44
1.8 weighted points to Jobma
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Jobma 60 · Turing 45
1.8 weighted points to Jobma
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Jobma 35 · Turing 25
1.5 weighted points to Jobma
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Jobma 62 · Turing 48
1.1 weighted points to Jobma
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +13.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +13.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobma minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Jobma | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 42 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 28 | +12 | +2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 44 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 27 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 48 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 36 (F) | +13 | +13.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Jobma | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 17 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Jobma last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next