§ The result
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and LinkedIn Recruiter tie at 57.
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and LinkedIn Recruiter tie at 57 under rubric v1.0 inside the Sourcing cohort, arriving there from different criteria. Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads 2 of the 7 criteria and LinkedIn Recruiter 5, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84, LinkedIn Recruiter 50) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 91% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
Vendor profile
LinkedIn Recruiter
LinkedIn Recruiter is LinkedIn's enterprise sourcing and candidate-management platform, whose Hiring Assistant add-on and AI-Assisted Search use AI to turn intake notes into qualifications, source and rank candidates, evaluate applicants against recruiter-set qualifications, and draft or send outreach.
§ The record
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and LinkedIn Recruiter are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | LinkedIn Recruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2022 | 2002 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
6.1 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
20% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 52 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67
3.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 50 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66
1.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 56 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62
0.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 60 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68
0.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
0.6 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 35 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38
0.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Juicebox (PeopleGPT) minus LinkedIn Recruiter.
| Category | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | LinkedIn Recruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 67 | -15 | -3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 50 | +34 | +6.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 62 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 66 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 68 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 57 (F) | - | -0.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | LinkedIn Recruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 34 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next