Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) vs Sense
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Sense
Sense is a conversational AI talent engagement platform that screens, scores, matches, and schedules candidates for high-volume recruiting via chatbot, SMS/WhatsApp, and voice AI on top of a customer's ATS.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
1 point separates Sense and Juicebox (PeopleGPT).
Sense (Screening) edges Juicebox (PeopleGPT) (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 58 to 57. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Sense: Sense is ahead on Human Oversight Design and Juicebox (PeopleGPT) on Bias Audit Transparency. Juicebox (PeopleGPT) takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84, Sense 72), 86% of the weighted advantage it builds, while the widest raw gap is on Human Oversight Design, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 50 to Sense 64.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT)2
- Sense5
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design50 vs 64
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Sense under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Sense |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2022 | 2016 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight32% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)84Sense722.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight57% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)50Sense641.7 weighted points to Sense
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight81% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)52Sense601.6 weighted points to Sense
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight88% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)35Sense380.4 weighted points to Sense
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight93% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)55Sense520.4 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)56Sense580.3 weighted points to Sense
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)60Sense620.2 weighted points to Sense
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Juicebox (PeopleGPT) minus Sense, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Sense | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 72 | +12 | +2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 58 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 64 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 57F | 58F | -1 | -1.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Sense | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Sense has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and Sense sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains, and 19 for Sense, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sense last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.