Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) vs Tezi
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
1 point separates Tezi and Juicebox (PeopleGPT).
Tezi (Screening) edges Juicebox (PeopleGPT) (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 58 to 57. Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and Tezi each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split Tezi holds (headed by Human Oversight Design) adds up to more weighted points. One criterion, Human Oversight Design, is both the widest raw gap (Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 50, Tezi 63) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 12% weight it makes up 66% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT)3
- Tezi3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design50 vs 63
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2022 | 2024 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight45% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)50Tezi631.6 weighted points to Tezi
- 2
Customer Documentation
8% weight67% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)60Tezi500.8 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight80% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)35Tezi380.4 weighted points to Tezi
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight91% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)55Tezi580.4 weighted points to Tezi
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight96% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)84Tezi830.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)56Tezi550.1 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Juicebox (PeopleGPT) minus Tezi, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 52 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 83 | +1 | +0.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 55 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 63 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 57F | 58F | -1 | -1.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.