Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Keka vs Workstream
Keka
Keka is an HR and payroll suite whose Keka Hire ATS scores each applicant against recruiter-defined role requirements and runs an AI screening conversation that decides which candidates reach the shortlist.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Workstream
Workstream is a mobile-first HR, payroll and hiring platform for hourly, multi-location employers such as QSR franchisees. Its hiring suite pairs a text-to-apply applicant tracking system with VoiceAI phone screens and VideoAI asynchronous video interviews, which return transcripts, AI summaries, pass/fail results for each question and match scores.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
2 points separate Workstream and Keka.
Workstream (Screening) edges Keka (ATS-integrated) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 39 to 37. Keka and Workstream each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split Workstream holds (headed by Article 11 Technical Documentation) adds up to more weighted points. Article 11 Technical Documentation, at 20%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to Workstream (Keka 30, Workstream 40), 59% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Human Oversight Design, Keka 50 to Workstream 61.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Keka3
- Workstream3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design50 vs 61
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Keka is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Workstream under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Workstream is in scope of
| Record | Keka | Workstream |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight41% of the movement so far
Keka30Workstream402.0 weighted points to Workstream
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight68% of the movement so far
Keka50Workstream611.3 weighted points to Workstream
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight80% of the movement so far
Keka40Workstream350.6 weighted points to Keka
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight89% of the movement so far
Keka30Workstream270.4 weighted points to Keka
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Keka50Workstream470.4 weighted points to Keka
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Keka55Workstream560.1 weighted points to Workstream
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Keka minus Workstream, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Keka | Workstream | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 20 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 27 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 47 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 61 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 56 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 37F | 39F | -2 | -1.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Keka | Workstream | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Workstream has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Workstream sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain, and 34 for Workstream, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Keka last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workstream last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.