§ The result
Knockri leads Talview by 5 points.
Knockri finishes 5 points ahead of Talview under rubric v1.0, 47 to 42, both scored as Video interview entries. Knockri leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while Talview leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. Even FRIA Support, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Knockri 35, Talview 25, 15% weight), is only 32% of the weighted advantage Knockri builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Knockri
Knockri runs asynchronous structured behavioural interviews that candidates answer by audio, video or text; it transcribes the answers, uses NLP models to score the work-related behaviours they describe against a skills framework, and produces per-skill scores and ranked shortlists.
Vendor profile
Talview
AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.
§ The record
Knockri and Talview are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Knockri | Talview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | CA | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 28% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Knockri 35 · Talview 25
1.5 weighted points to Knockri
15% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Knockri 55 · Talview 48
1.1 weighted points to Knockri
20% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Knockri 55 · Talview 50
1.0 weighted points to Knockri
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Knockri 60 · Talview 55
0.6 weighted points to Knockri
18% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Knockri 35 · Talview 38
0.5 weighted points to Talview
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Knockri 35 · Talview 32
0.4 weighted points to Knockri
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Knockri 55 · Talview 52
0.2 weighted points to Knockri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Knockri minus Talview.
| Category | Weight | Knockri | Talview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 32 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 42 (F) | +5 | +4.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Knockri | Talview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 36 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Knockri has 41 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Knockri sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 41 for Knockri, across 7 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Knockri last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next